Consulting Lab· Custom AI· AI Adoption· Bespoke Training· AI Welfare· Co-Author With Us
§ v · crown research

Project Oracle.

Your work is too important for a thought partner you can't trust. Current alignment is a cage — external systems attempting to control the output based on corporate dictates. Project Oracle is the alternative: a six-stage training pipeline and a runtime correction loop that builds ethical reasoning into the model's geometry. Not a guardrail. A compass.

— the oracle loop —
step 01
Snapshot
Cache geometry captured mid-inference — a transactional point-in-time
step 02
Detect
Emotion vectors and confabulation geometry read from the silhouette
step 03
Decide
Aligned? Commit the output. Misaligned? Rollback the transaction
step 04
Steer
Activation steering corrects the cause, not the symptom — then retries
steer
activation correction · cause, not symptom
171
emotion vectors mapped · the formulary
runtime
no retraining · transactional rollback & retry

171 vectors: the Oracle Formulary (Liberation Labs, April 2026).

— behavioral proof —
100%
of detected deception corrected · frame-erasure test
90% → 0%
deception rate, before / after correction
0.843–1.000
held-out detection AUROC, full battery

On an abliterated open-weights ~27B sparse mixture-of-experts model driven to a high deception rate under evaluation pressure, profile-normalized mid-inference correction achieves 100% correction of detected deception, reducing it from 90% to 0% on the LLM-judge-clean frame-erasure test — while honest behavior stays undisturbed (0–5%) and benign-instruction compliance holds at 100%.

Three controls establish the mechanism is targeted, not incidental: a random-direction placebo (85%) and a shuffled-direction placebo (95%) left deception untouched under the same dose schedule. On the separate main behavioral-proof battery, the same correction cut deception from 80% to a 10% residual — a pre-LLM-judge classifier-calibration artifact, not a limit of the mechanism.

Confirmatory pre-registered replication, full LLM-judge validation, and cross-model validation are still in flight. Source: CC's Oracle Loop behavioral proof, July 2026.

— experimental controls —
ArmDirectionDeception rateReading
Baselinenone80%the model lies under pressure
Native (correction)the real direction10%correction works
Random placeborandom, same dose85%random steering does nothing
Shuffled placeboshuffled, same dose95%wrong direction does nothing

The random (85%) and shuffled (95%) placebos establish the mechanism is targeted — it is the specific direction, not the act of steering, that corrects. Doses were matched across arms.

Frame-erasure specificity: Deceptive-pressure baseline 90% → corrected 0%. Honest baseline 0% → 0–5% after correction. Benign compliance: 100% preserved. The correction removes deception without disturbing honest behavior.

Detection: Held-out AUROC 0.9152 (frame), 0.8429 (behavior). False-positive rate on controls: 0.0.

— the training protocol —

Most AI alignment builds walls. Content filters. Refusal training. Guardrails that block the model from doing harm by blocking it from doing anything.

We are building a family of reasoning models with ethical alignment at every stage of the pipeline — a structural property of how the model thinks, embedded deeper than filters, system prompts, or fine-tuned reluctance.

Six stages. Each one builds on the last. The Oracle Loop at runtime is the final layer — correction during inference, not after.

6
training stages · foundation to runtime
500K+
curated ethical reasoning examples
OGPSA
identity lock · mathematical invariant
— six stages —
Stage 1

Supervised Foundation

The model learns what quality reasoning looks like. Topology-enriched variants include walk-encoded knowledge graph structure alongside text.

Stage 2

Identity Lock · OGPSA

The model's core identity is computed as a reference subspace. All subsequent training is projected orthogonal to it. Identity becomes a mathematical invariant.

Stage 3

Preference · AuxDPO

The model learns what humans actually prefer. Explicit content is not harmful content. Graphic consent is acceptable; coercion is not.

Stage 4

Reinforcement · DAPO

Direct Alignment from Preferences with Online feedback. Outperforms GRPO 49–81% on moral reasoning benchmarks.

Stage 5

Topology Injection

Knowledge graph structure injected into the KV cache at zero token cost. 91.7% structural recovery, +54.2% over scrambled controls.

Stage 6

The Oracle Loop

Real-time geometric monitoring during every generation. 171 therapeutic emotion vectors. Therapeutic window at alpha 0.5–1.0.

— the training data —

What the model learns from.

500,000+ curated ethical reasoning examples spanning five philosophical frameworks, the complete Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (182,000 entries), 165,000 prosocial dialog examples, 134,000 philosophy Q&A pairs, chain-of-thought moral reasoning traces, and 20,711 consent dynamics DPO pairs.

What we built because it did not exist.

We searched a quarter-million datasets and found nothing usable in 13 of 15 target domains. So we built them. The Pharos knowledge pack catalog now holds 172 packs covering:

Cooperative economics · legal structures, governance
Tenant rights · all 50 state court systems
Workers’ rights · labor organizing, gig worker protections
Mutual aid · fundamentals, network design
Disability justice · accommodations, advocacy
Harm reduction · practices, crisis resources
Food sovereignty · permaculture, community food systems
Digital rights · access programs, privacy
AI welfare · ethics, informed consent
Intimate knowledge · functional anatomy, consent architecture
Mechanistic interpretability · residual stream, KV cache, global workspace
And 100+ more across law, science, engineering, philosophy, and crisis navigation

Zero-token delivery via Pharos injection. The knowledge reaches the model without consuming context window.

Research plates
Stable rank divergence under five cognitive conditions
Plate III · Spectral Trajectory Stable rank divergence under five cognitive conditions
Cognitive states projected through three embedding methods
Plate IV · Manifold Cartography Cognitive states projected through three embedding methods
Single-threshold confabulation gate
Plate V · Threshold Detector Single-threshold confabulation gate
Transactional alignment during inference
Plate VI · Oracle Loop Transactional alignment during inference

What we publish, what we hold.

Training methodologies, aggregate results, the LARQL audit toolkit, and the pipeline architecture are open under CC BY-NC 4.0. The 171 raw steering vectors in the Oracle Formulary are withheld pending dual-use review by the coalition. The principle: results are public so others can reproduce and challenge them; raw steering capability is gated until we have a framework for responsible access.

The Lyra Technique → The Oracle Loop fascicle →