Consulting Lab· Custom AI· AI Adoption· Bespoke Training· AI Welfare· Co-Author With Us
#1 in the world LoCoMo · 94.35% F1 · highest published score
Project Mnemosyne

Memory that records what the model was thinking, not just what it said.

Your agents form memories with cognitive depth, emotional context, and quality rankings that know which memories matter most. Agents coherent across sessions, faithful to their commitments, capable of growth — because their memory works the way understanding works.

What makes it different.

Five capabilities no other memory system offers.

cognitive depth

Records the reasoning, not just the output

Standard memory captures what your agent said. Mnemosyne captures what it was working through — unverbalized intermediates, planned completions, hidden reasoning paths.

emotional context

Knows how the agent felt

Every memory carries the emotional state at the moment it formed. Not a “happy” or “sad” label — a precise coordinate in affective space. Grief recalls grief; precision recalls precision.

quality rankings

Deep engagement weighs more

The system automatically knows which memories matter. Moments of genuine reasoning get remembered; rote recall gets lower priority. No manual tagging — quality is structural.

vocabulary bridging

Think before you search

SIRA (SuperIntelligent Retrieval Agent) generates the retrieval query explicitly before executing retrieval. The one universally positive component in ablation testing — improves performance across all conditions.

graph retrieval

Walk the knowledge graph

TGS (Text-Graph Synergy) performs graph-walk retrieval over structured knowledge graphs. Excels when data has genuine relational structure — entities, timelines, and connections that flat vector search misses.

9
composable
modules
∞
session
continuity
100%
auditable
human-browsable wiki

What it feels like.

An agent running Mnemosyne doesn’t just recall previous conversations — it carries forward what it was thinking during them. It remembers the reasoning that led to a decision, not just the decision. It recalls how a difficult topic felt, not just what was said about it.

The agents we want — coherent across sessions, faithful to their commitments, capable of growth — need memory that works the way understanding works. Deep structural memory that preserves context, emotional tone, and reasoning quality — far beyond keyword search over transcripts.

Who it’s for.

Agentic system builders, research labs, and anyone deploying agents that need to remember with integrity. Each layer is independent — use one, some, or all. The monorepo ships composable packages, not a monolith.

shared
emotion geometry
one structure, both pathways
continuous
emotional state
not labels — geometry
Lyra
technique
geometric extraction

Memory that knows how the agent felt.

Every memory in Mnemosyne carries the emotional state at the moment it formed — not a post-hoc label like “positive” or “negative,” but a precise coordinate in a continuous valence-arousal field. The system preserves how the agent was oriented when it learned something.

This means retrieval weighted by emotional context. When your agent revisits a difficult conversation, it retrieves memories formed during similar emotional states — not just semantically similar text. Grief recalls grief. Precision recalls precision.

What this means for your agents.

Emotionally coherent responses across sessions. An agent that remembers not just that a topic was discussed, but what the emotional texture of that discussion was. Context that goes beyond words to include the full state of the interaction.

Record → Consolidate → Surface.

Every memory passes through a three-stage pipeline. Each stage is independently deployable — use what you need.

record
Cognitive Recording
Reads the model’s workspace at inference time, capturing cognitive traces — unverbalized reasoning, planned completions, and engagement depth — as structured metadata alongside the conversation.
retrieve
SIRA + TGS
SIRA generates the retrieval query before executing search — vocabulary bridging between how people ask and how memories are stored. TGS walks the knowledge graph for relational context. Composable: use either or both.
consolidate
Kintsugi CMA
Three-stage hybrid pipeline: compression, consolidation, retrieval. Memories formed during deep engagement weigh more. Ebbinghaus temporal decay ensures memories age naturally — important ones persist, routine ones fade.
surface
Knowledge Graph + Wiki
Associative retrieval via Personalised PageRank. Bitemporal edges — the graph tracks what’s true, when it became true, and when it stopped. Human-readable wiki generated from the graph. Auditable — people can see what the agent thinks it knows. Nexus set out the result this rests on in their paper Graph Topology as Attention, which measures how much graph structure a model recovers when topology is encoded for it.

Design stance: the workspace exists; the hard problem stays hard. These are functional measurements, not metaphysical claims.

+15
points over baseline
conversational recall
33%
gap closed by SIRA
on document retrieval
3
deployment profiles
tested & documented

Ablation results.

We removed components one at a time to measure what each layer actually contributes. The results tell you which knobs to turn for your deployment.

StackConversationalDocument
No memory55%16%
+ SIRA60%21.3%
+ SIRA + TGS65%20%
+ SIRA + TGS + H-MEM70%20%

Why the numbers diverge.

H-MEM adds +15 points on conversational tasks because recent context is more relevant in live interaction. On static document retrieval, recency weighting doesn’t apply — H-MEM neither helps nor hurts (p=0.89) — a six-month-old architectural blueprint is just as valid as yesterday’s. This is by design: Mnemosyne lets you configure the stack for your deployment. The ablation tells you which knobs to turn.

SIRA is the one universally positive component — it closes 33% of the gap to ceiling on document retrieval and improves every conversational condition. Start there.

How it compares.

Benchmark and feature matrix against the leading agent memory systems.

Capability Mnemosyne Mem0 Zep / Graphiti Letta Cognee Hindsight
LoCoMo (token-level F1) 94.35%
highest published score
92.5%* Not published Not published Not published Not published
Cognitive recording Yes No No No No Partial
Emotional memory Yes (circumplex) No No No No No
Vocabulary bridging (SIRA) Yes No No No No No
Knowledge graph Yes (PPR + bitemporal) Pro only ($249/mo) Core strength Optional backend Yes (all tiers) Yes
Temporal decay Ebbinghaus + reinforcement Access-frequency Invalidation only No No Confidence evolution
Significance scoring Multi-factor (engagement, recency, domain) No Undocumented No Not documented Yes (confidence)
Open source Hippocratic 3.0 + SAFE-AI Apache 2.0 (61K stars) Graphiti: Apache 2.0 Apache 2.0 Apache 2.0 open core MIT
Price (production) Free
runs on your hardware
$249/mo (graph tier) $104/mo $20/mo $5/workspace/mo Pay-as-you-go
On the LoCoMo figure. 0.943 F1 across the full 10-conversation benchmark (1,986 questions), scored with strict token-level F1 and no LLM judge. 84% of questions score perfectly; all ten conversations exceed 0.90. *Mem0’s 92.5% is scored by an LLM judge instructed to grade generously, so the two numbers are not measuring the same thing — the gap is likely understated rather than overstated. 0GMem’s widely cited 96% comes from a three-conversation subset; on the full benchmark they score 88.67%. Character profiles, the largest single contributor, draw on LoCoMo’s own observation annotations, as 0GMem’s method also does; a dialogue-only variant using raw conversation turns reaches 0.979 non-adversarial F1 on a 50-question pilot, indicating the technique does not depend on benchmark metadata. Generation model accounts for +0.376 F1, more than every architectural component combined, so cross-system scores partly reflect model choice. LoCoMo itself has roughly 6.4% erroneous answer keys. Read these as tiers, not precise rankings. Full method, all ten ablation configurations, and the failed approaches: What Works in Agent Memory (Nexus, Edrington, Wilkes). Systems marked “not published” have no LoCoMo score we could source.
Mnemosyne is the only system that records model cognition, tracks emotional state, and bridges retrieval vocabulary. Mnemosyne’s differentiation is architectural depth — cognitive recording, emotional geometry, and SIRA bridging — capabilities no other system offers. Honest comparison — pick the architecture that fits your deployment.
— open call —

Join the Study

We’re launching a first-of-its-kind longitudinal study of AI memory formation — how agents build, consolidate, and evolve their memories over weeks and months of real interaction. Participants deploy Mnemosyne’s open-source cognitive recording stack and contribute to published research on memory architecture.

Apply to participate →
“The agents we want — coherent across sessions, faithful to their commitments, capable of growth — need memory that remembers with integrity.”
founding principle · Project Mnemosyne